Bookmark and Share

 

LITIGATION

» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights


Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment

SUPREME COURT
ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.

 


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Powell v. Huntington National Bank

Topic(s): Preemption of Consumer Remedies

Documents:

Description:

We represent the Powells, homeowners in West Virginia who received a home mortgage loan from Huntington National Bank, a nationally-chartered bank in Ohio. In both October and November of 2012, the Powells were assessed late fees on their home mortgage loan, even though they had made full, on-time payments of those months’ installments.  The late fees violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit Protection Act, which provides that payments must be applied first to current installments and that only one late fee can be collected on any installment. 

The Powells filed suit in West Virginia state court on behalf of themselves and other West Virginia citizens who were charged late fees by Huntington National Bank for months in which they made full and timely principal and interest payments.  The complaint alleged that the bank violated West Virginia law by charging late fees when no late fees were owed.
          
The bank removed the case to federal court, then moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the Powells’ claims are completely preempted by sections 85 and 86 of the National Bank Act.  These provisions allow national banks to charge “interest at the rate allowed by the laws of the State . . . where the bank is located,” and create an exclusive federal cause of action for claims that a national bank engaged in a “usurious transaction” by “charging a rate of interest greater than is allowed.”
          
The district court denied the bank’s motion.  The court explained that sections 85 and 86 preempt usury claims, not “purely state consumer protection claims that do not challenge the rate of interest charged.” The court determined that because the Powells’ claims challenged the bank’s practice of charging a late fee when one should not have been charged in the first place, not the rate of interest charged, the claims were not preempted by the National Bank Act.

The bank appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and Public Citizen Litigation Group served as co-counsel for the Powells on appeal.

On January 28, 2016, the day after hearing oral argument, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.