Bookmark and Share

 

LITIGATION

» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights


Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment

SUPREME COURT
ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.

 


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

AcroMed Collateral Attack (Lloyd v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc., and AcroMed Corporation)

Topic(s): Class Actions
Class Actions – Objections to Proposed Settlements
Citation: Civil Action No. 99-C-0289 (Cabell Cty, West. Va)
Docket: 01-1897

Documents:

Description:

Melissa Lloyd was a class member as defined in the AcroMed bone screw class action settlement, which defined the class to include all people who were implanted with AcroMed bone screws on or before December 31, 1996. Lloyd had her implant surgery two weeks before that deadline. Notice of the non-opt-out settlement was published in January and February of 1997. Lloyd did not see the notice and, at the time of the notice, her injuries had not yet manifested. After she became injured, Ms. Lloyd filed suit in West Virginia against the hospital at which she had the implant surgery and AcroMed.

AcroMed made a motion in the federal district court in Philadelphia in which the class action proceedings were pending and asked for an order to show cause why Lloyd and her lawyers should not be held in contempt of the order approving the class action settlement, which purported to bar suits by class members against AcroMed. Public Citizen appeared on behalf of Lloyd and her lawyers in the contempt proceeding and argued that the request for contempt was really a request to enjoin the West Virginia proceeding in light of the class action settlement. AcroMed did not disagree, and the court granted our request to brief the issues. In our briefs, we argued that the court in Philadelphia never obtained personal jurisdiction over Ms. Lloyd, because she was not given notice and an opportunity to opt out of the class action settlement and that, therefore, her West Virginia suit could go forward. The district court disagreed, held Lloyd and her lawyers in contempt, and enjoined them from pursuing the suit against AcroMed in the West Virginia court. We appealed to the Third Circuit. Before the appeal was decided, however, Lloyd and AcroMed reached a settlement, under which AcroMed paid Lloyd $200,000—several times more than class members received under the class settlement.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.