Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Bridgestone Retail Operations v. Brown

Topic(s): Arbitration
Docket: 14-790



This is a case in which the California Supreme Court ordered a lower court to vacate and reconsider a decision in light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation of Los Angeles. The Iskanian decision held that an employment agreement that purports to bar employees from asserting claims for civil penalties under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) is unenforceable under state law, and that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) does not preempt state law and require enforcement of such PAGA waivers. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Iskanian in January 2015. Meanwhile, the petitioner in this case filed a petition for certiorari seeking review of the same issues that had been raised in Iskanian: Whether the FAA preempts the holding of Iskanian. PCLG is cocounsel for respondents and has joined in filing a brief in opposition to the petition for certiorari explaining that the same reasons for denial of certiorari in Iskanian apply even more forcefully here given that the California Supreme Court merely remanded a case for further consideration in light of Iskanian. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.