Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Massachusetts Delivery Association v. Martha Coakley

Topic(s): Preemption of Consumer Remedies



The Massachusetts Delivery Association brought this case against the Massachusetts Attorney General, contending that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA), which prohibits states from enacting or enforcing laws “related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier . . . with respect to the transportation of property” preempts a Massachusetts statute requiring workers to be classified as employees rather than independent contractors for the purpose of the state’s wage laws if the workers perform services within the usual course of the employer’s business. The district court held that the provision is not preempted. On appeal to the First Circuit, Public Citizen filed an amicus brief in support of the Massachusetts Attorney General explaining that the FAAAA does not preempt laws that do not target motor carriers “with respect to the transportation of property,” and that background employment laws do not “relate to” motor carrier prices, routes, or services. The First Circuit reversed the district court’s decision and remanded to the district court to determine, based on a full review of the record, whether the law’s effect on prices, routes, and services is sufficiently significant for it to be preempted.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.