Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

GenOn Power Midwest v. Bell

Topic(s): Hazardous Substances and Environmental Protection
Preemption of Consumer Remedies
Docket: 13-1013



In this case, residents of Pennsylvania who live near a coal-fired power plant brought a state-law nuisance, negligence, and trespass case against the operator of the plant, GenOn Power Midwest, based on the plant’s emission of chemicals, odors, and particulates on to the plaintiffs’ property. GenOn moved to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the Clean Air Act (CAA). The district court dismissed the case, but the Third Circuit reversed, explaining that the CAA does not preempt state common-law actions based on the law of the source state. GenOn sought review by the Supreme Court, where Public Citizen served as co-counsel for the plaintiffs in opposing the petition. Our opposition explained that it is hornbook law that the CAA preserves injured parties’ rights to resort to state common law to redress injuries suffered from air pollution, that there is no circuit split on whether the CAA preempts source-state common-law claims, and that the decision below specifically tracked established Supreme Court precedent. On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court denied GenOn’s petition.

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.