Bookmark and Share

 

LITIGATION

» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights


Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment

SUPREME COURT
ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.

 


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Palmer v. KlearGear.com

Topic(s): Consumer Justice
Internet Free Speech - Miscellaneous

Documents:

Related Press Releases:

Description:

Five years ago, John Palmer ordered Christmas gifts online from a web merchant called KlearGear.com. The gifts never arrived, and John’s attempts to contact KlearGear.com were unsuccessful. His wife then posted a negative review on RipoffReport.com. In 2012, the Palmers received a demand from KlearGear.com for $3500. According to KlearGear.com, through his wife’s post, John violated a “non-disparagement clause” in the site’s Terms of Use that prohibits users from taking any action that negatively impacts KlearGear.com or its reputation, on pain of a $3500 fine.

When the Palmers refused to pay – in part because the Term was not on the website at the time of his purchases.com – KlearGear.com reported the supposed “debt” to the credit reporting agencies. When the Palmers disputed the debt with the credit reporting agencies, KlearGear.com confirmed the supposed “debt” to the credit reporting agencies. More than a year later – after the Palmers have been turned down for credit, and had their car loan delayed and paid a higher interest rate on it – this “debt” still mars John Palmer’s credit.

On December 18, 2013, Public Citizen filed suit against KlearGear.com and its debt collector in federal court on behalf of the Palmers. The suit seeks a declaration that John does not owe any “debt” for violating the “non-disparagement clause,” and it seeks compensatory and punitive damages from KlearGear.com for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, defamation, interference with prospective economic relations, and infliction of emotional distress.

Because KlearGear.com never appeared to defend, on May 15, 2014, the district court granted the Palmers a default judgment declaring that “John Palmer does not now, and never did, owe KlearGear.com or any other party any money based on KlearGear.com's ‘non-disparagement clause’”; holding KlearGear.com liable for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and common law; and setting a hearing to determine damages. On June 25, 2014, the district court held a damages hearing, heard testimony from the Palmers, and awarded them $102,250 in compensatory damages and $204,500 in punitive damages for a total award of $306,750 (in addition to costs and attorneys’ fees).

Support the Palmers and our defense of free speech online.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.