Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals v. State of Arkansas

Topic(s): Preemption of Consumer Remedies



The State of Arkansas sued the pharmaceutical company Janssen under the state’s Medicaid fraud and unfair trade practices laws. The claims were based on Janssen’s marketing of the antipsychotic drug Risperdal without adequate warnings about risks posed by the drug, including weight gain and diabetes. An Arkansas trial court ruled for the state and imposed penalties on Janssen exceeding $1 billion. Janssen appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court, raising a variety of statutory and constitutional objections to the judgment, including the argument that the state’s claims are impliedly preempted by FDA regulation of prescription drugs.

In support of the state, Public Citizen filed an amicus curiae brief demonstrating that the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckman v. Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee, which held claims of “fraud on the FDA” to be preempted by federal law, does not apply to the claims asserted by Arkansas in this case. Without addressing preemption, the court ruled for Janssen, holding that the conduct at issue did not fall within the scope of the state Medicaid law.

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.