Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Brown v. Ralphs

Topic(s): Arbitration
Docket: 11-880



In this case, an intermediate California appellate court ruled that an arbitration agreement purporting to prohibit employees from asserting claims under California’s Private Attorneys General Act was unenforceable. The defendant, Ralphs Grocery Company, which was accused in the lawsuit of committing numerous violations of California labor laws, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking the Supreme Court to hold that even arbitration agreements that prohibit particular types of claims (as opposed to merely requiring that they be arbitrated) must be enforced under the Federal Arbitration Act to override state laws. Public Citizen Litigation Group assisted in the preparation of a brief in opposition to the petition, arguing that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction because there is no final judgment below, that the case did not merit review because of the absence of conflicting authority in the lower courts, and that the decision was correct in light of the Supreme Court’s repeated statements that arbitration agreements are merely forum selection provisions and do not deprive litigants of statutory rights of action. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari.

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.