Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

North Las Vegas Police Department, et al. v. Sheila Conatser, et al.

Topic(s): Court Procedure, Federal Jurisdiction, and Appellate Jurisdiction
Qualified Immunity and Sovereign Immunity
Docket: 11-540



Public Citizen represented the parents of Phillip Conatser, who was shot and killed in an encounter with local police. The Conatsers sued the police for excessive force, and the officers sought immunity for their actions. At the heart of the dispute was whether the officers were justified in shooting Phillip: they claimed he charged them with a knife, but two neighbors who witnessed the incident testified Phillip did not threaten the officers. The district court denied the officers immunity because of the factual dispute, which must be decided by a jury. The court of appeals held the officers were not entitled to an immediate appeal of the denial of immunity because of the factual dispute. The officers asked the Supreme Court to the case, and in February 2012, Public Citizen filed a brief opposing Supreme Court review, arguing that the lower courts were correct that the factual dispute should be decided by a jury rather than preemptively resolved in the officers’ favor by judges on an appeal of the denial of immunity. On March 19, 2012, the Supreme Court denied review.

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.