Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Natural Resources Defense Council v. FDA

Topic(s): Court Procedure, Federal Jurisdiction, and Appellate Jurisdiction
Hazardous Substances and Environmental Protection



In this case, a federal district court ruled that NRDC lacked standing to challenge the FDA's failure to regulate antibacterial soaps because NRDC's members, who faced a threat of injury from exposure to antibacterial soap in their workplaces, could just buy their own soap and take it to work with them. The court's holding that a person lacks standing to sue if she can avoid an injury by making an otherwise unnecessary expenditure of money, or changing her behavior in some other undesired way, is contrary to many court decisions and would severely restrict the circumstances in which plaintiffs in environmental, consumer health and safety, and many other types of cases could bring suit. Public Citizen, on behalf of itself and several other organizations, filed an amicus curiae brief in support of NRDC's appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit challenging the dismissal of the case.

The Second Circuit held that NRDC had presented evidence of standing sufficient to withstand summary judgment as to the regulation of one of the antibiotics at issue but not the other. The court explained that standing may be based on exposure to a potentially dangerous product, and NRDC's evidence established that triclosan is potentially dangerous and that at least one of its members is frequently exposed to soap that contained triclosan. As to triclocarban, the court explained that NRDC presented no evidence of members' direct exposure but relied on evidence that the proliferation of triclocarban may contribute to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The court held that this evidence does not establish an injury sufficiently particularized to satisfy the injury-in-fact requirement of Article III standing. The court vacated the district court's grant of summary judgment and remanded for further proceedings.

On remand, FDA and NRDC agreed to timetables for publishing tentative final monographs and final monographs for antiseptic hand wash products, health care antiseptic products, and consumer antiseptic hand rub products. The district court entered the agreement as a consent decree.

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.