Bookmark and Share

 

LITIGATION

» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights


Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment

SUPREME COURT
ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.

 


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, et al.

Topic(s): Consumer Justice
Scope of Statutory Rights and Remedies
Docket: 08-1200

Documents:

Description:

In this case, the question before the U.S. Supreme Court was whether debt collectors can claim ignorance of the law as a defense to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), the federal law that protects consumers from harassing, deceptive, and unfair debt-collection practices. In September 2009, Public Citizen filed an amicus brief on behalf of national advocacy groups (Public Citizen, AARP, National Association of Consumer Advocates, National Consumer Law Center, and U.S. PIRG: The Federation of State PIRGs). Among other things, the brief argues that excusing ignorance of the law would deter enforcement, inhibit development of the law, distort the incentives created by the statute, and encourage the very collection abuses that Congress sought to prevent. In an opinion by Justice Sotomayor that cited Public Citizen’s amicus brief, the Supreme Court rejected the debt collectors’ proposed mistake-of-law defense.

Copyright © 2010 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.  Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.