Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Los Angeles County v. Max Rettele

Topic(s): Qualified Immunity and Sovereign Immunity
Docket: 06-605



Unconstitutional Search & Seizure

  1. Is it clearly established that an officer must immediately call off a valid warrant calling for the arrest of African Americans merely because he observes one or more Caucasians in the house to be searched?
  2. Is it clearly established that, in lawfully executing a search warrant at a residence, it is an unnecessarily painful and/or degrading and/or undue invasion of privacy for officers to order people — who are in bed and who claim to be naked — to show their hands and get out of bed?
  3. Can a Circuit Court of Appeals find that the law is "clearly established" so as to foreclose a finding of qualified immunity under Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001) when even the circuit judges cannot agree on whether a constitutional violation occurred?

Scott Nelson of Public Citizen was co-counsel for the respondent at the cert stage. The Supreme Court summarily reversed the Ninth Circuit's opinion, finding no Fourth Amendment violation.

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.