Bookmark and Share

 

LITIGATION

» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights


Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment

SUPREME COURT
ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.

 


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 2000, et al.

Topic(s): Internet Free Speech - Liability of Gripe Site Operator for Violations by Message Board Speakers
Union Democracy
Citation: 00-08 (D.Minn)
Docket: 00-08DWF/AJB

Documents:

Related Press Releases:

Description:

Northwest sued the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, a Teamsters local, its reform leadership, and two rank-and-filers charging them with having fomented a “sickout” by flight attendance over the millenial New Year holiday, seeking to pressure the company during collective bargaining, allegedly in violation of the Railway Labor Act’s prohibition of wildcat strikes. Public Citizen represented the two rank-and-file defendants, who were sued over their web sites, where anonymous individuals had posted comments supporting the idea of not working during a period when there were fears of the impact of the Y2K glitch. The IBT consented to entry of a temporary restraining order, which was issued against the rank-and=-filers without any notice or opportunity to be heard. Public Citizen argued against the continuation of the TRO and, when the trial judge kept it in place, appealed on the ground that the TRO had been converted into a preliminary injunction that was an unconstitutional prior restraint as well as a violation of section 230 immunity. Northwest sought an order compelling expedited discovery from the Local, its officers and the rank-and-filers, and the IBT connived to have that order entered. Pursuant to the order, Northwest seized all of the individual defendants’ personal computers; Public Citizen appealed from that order, arguing that the order was a gross violation of privacy and constituted overbroad discovery. Northwest also sought an order compelling the rank-and-file defendants to identify the anonymous posters to their web site message boards, which Public Citizen opposed under the First Amendment. On the eve of the appellate ruling on the emergency appeal, the district court dissolved the TRO against the rank-and-file defendants. The airline later dismissed its suit after a new collective bargaining agreement was adopted.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.