Bookmark and Share

 

LITIGATION

» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights


Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment

SUPREME COURT
ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.

 


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

In Re: Sulzer Orthopedics and Knee Prosthesis Products Liability Litigation

Topic(s): Class Actions – Objections to Proposed Settlements
Citation: 03-4325, 03-4518, 04-3360 (6th cir)

Documents:

Description:

Class member, Linda Mediate had undergone surgery to remove a Sulzer hip implant covered by this class action settlement. Ms. Mediate’s counsel allegedly mailed her claim form two days after the settlement deadline. The Claims Administrator denied her claim as untimely, and the Special Master affirmed that denial. Ms. Mediate moved the district court to overturn that decision, but the court rejected her request and those of many other late-filing class members, ruling that the class settlement absolutely precluded judicial review of the Special Master’s determinations.

Public Citizen represented Ms. Mediate on appeal, contending that class members did not waive their rights to judicial review and that the class settlement not only does not bar judicial review, but reinforces class members’ right to such review by granting the district court broad jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the settlement. Moreover, the settlement’s use of the term of art "special master" to refer to the official deciding administrative appeals confirms that class members retained their right to seek further review of the Special Master’s determinations because both Article III of the Constitution and Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure guarantee judicial review of a special master’s determinations, even if the parties stipulate that the special master’s decisions are final. We also argued that a two-day delay in filing a claim is trivial as a matter of law and that under both the federal doctrine of excusable neglect and Delaware law on substantial compliance, her claim should have been processed and paid. Rejecting these arguments, the court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.