***Search other cases***

Roach v. T.L. Cannon Corp.

Topic(s): Class Actions
Workers' Rights
Court: Select Court

Related Documents:

Related Press Releases:

Description:

Plaintiffs are employees at Applebee’s restaurants who were not paid wages to which they were entitled under state and federal law. In 2010, Plaintiffs sued the company that owned and operated the restaurants for their wages and sought to proceed in a class action. Even though the plaintiffs presented evidence that defendants’ uniform policies and practices – such as a policy of docking employees for rest breaks they had not taken – led to the wage law violations, the district court denied class certification in March 2013, ruling that after the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Comcast v. Behrend, a class action cannot be maintained whenever monetary relief must be calculated on an individual basis for each member of the class. On behalf of the plaintiffs, Public Citizen filed a petition for permission to appeal to the Second Circuit in New York in April 2013. Our petition argued that the district court’s rule, if accepted, would dramatically reduce the availability of class actions, because there are many types of cases (such as wage-and-hour cases) in which each member of the plaintiff class is entitled to a different amount of damages. The district court’s decision reads the Comcast decision too broadly, the petition argued, and conflicts with the widespread and long-standing view of the courts of appeals that a class action for damages may sometimes be maintained based on a common theory of liability notwithstanding the need for individualized damages calculations.

The court heard argument in September 2014. On February 10, 2015, the Court vacated the denial of class certification and remanded. The Court agreed with us that the district court had read Comcast too broadly and that the Supreme Court had not imposed a categorical bar to class certification where damages must be calculated on an individual basis. Instead, the district court on remand should reconsider certification, applying the Second Circuit’s longstanding approach – undisturbed by Comcast – that the individuation of damages is just one factor to be considered in the certification inquiry and that class certification may be appropriate even where damages are individualized.