***Search other cases***

Ticketmaster v. Stearns

Docket: 11-983
Court: Select Court


1. In federal court, must all members of a putative class—not just the named plaintiff—have Article III standing to sue?

2. Did the 9th Circuit err in choosing to follow a state’s rule that only a named plaintiff needs to have standing to sue, regardless of the lack of standing of putative class members, and thereby disregarding the requirements of Article III standing?