|Date Of Involvement:||01/13/2010|
This case presented the following questions:
1. Whether a district court, after finding violations of the advance notice of reduction requirement in ERISA §204(h), errs in concluding that it lacks the authority to require the prior benefit provisions to be reinstated.
2. Whether, if the answer to Question 1 is “yes,” FNHRA unambiguously confers “rights” enforceable by Medicaid beneficiaries under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.