» Fair Arbitration

» Patient Safety and Medical Liability

» Preserving State Consumer Laws

» Whistleblower Protections

Sign Up

to receive regular updates on our campaigns for access to justice and consumer protection.

Recent Reports

October 26, 2016 - The Chamber of Litigation
August 22, 2016 - Comments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Forced Arbitration
March 4, 2016 - Forced Arbitration Letter to the Department of Education

Defensive Medicine: The Doctored Crisis

March 30, 2011 — Proposals to limit medical malpractice liability are a perennial feature of health care debates. At present, the principal claim of those seeking to limit liability is that malpractice liability causes massive extra costs through “defensive medicine”: Fear of litigation leads doctors to exercise grossly excessive caution, ordering unnecessary tests and procedures. Current House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) claimed in 2010 that “medical malpractice and the defensive medicine that doctors practice” is the “biggest cost driver” in all of medicine. Is Rep. Boehner correct? The reliable empirical evidence paints a vastly different picture.

This report, based on reliable published studies, covers the following topics:

  • The most empirically sound, evidence-based studies of defensive medicine usually find that its role is small.
  • Factors other than defensive medicine, such as financial incentives to order more tests, offer much better explanations for many of the practices that liability opponents deem defensive.
  • Defensive medicine cannot be driving the fast-paced growth of health care costs be-cause the costs of diagnostic testing — the principal type of purported defensive medicine — are small in proportion to overall health care spending.
  • Malpractice litigation has declined, but the decline has not slowed the growth of health care costs. Malpractice litigation is at the lowest level on record, and there is no evidence that the decline in litigation has slowed the growth of health care costs. This may because fear of litigation is unrelated to actual risk of litigation.

Read the press release

Read the report (PDF)

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.