Take Action Publications Press Room About Public Citizen Public Citizen Divisions Home
Advocates for justice, consumer access to the courts, and accountable government

JOIN US! |Take Action | Publications | About Congress Watch | Contact Us
Search

For Keyword(s)
advanced search

Email Signup

Sign up for our free activist updates.

Printer friendly pageEmail to a friend

Analysis of Corporate Profits, 1999

 

wpe1.jpg (46066 bytes)

Source: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board of Canada, 1999 Annual Report. Percentages reflect relative price levels of drugs sold by drug manufacturers to wholesalers, hospitals and pharmacies.


 

wpe2.jpg (40504 bytes)

Source: European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, The Pharmaceutical Industry in Figures, 2000. A drug is defined as a new chemical or biological entity if it has never before been marketed regardless of dosage form. This measure more accurately reflects the number of new drugs approved in a country or region of the world.


 

wpe3.jpg (36076 bytes)

Source: Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com); 1999 Company Annual Reports.


 

wpe4.jpg (40535 bytes)

Source: Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com).
Note: Due to the different number of companies in the Fortune 500 from selected industries, industry totals include profits from the nine largest (or most profitable) companies in each industry.


 

wpe9.jpg (28676 bytes)

Source: Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com).


wpeA.jpg (48646 bytes)

Source: Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com).


Profitability of Fortune 500 Drug Companies 1999 and 1998

Rank

Company

1999 Revenues (millions $)

% Change from '98

1999 Profits (millions $)

% Change from '98

Profits as % of Revenue

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholders' Equity

1

Merck

$32,714

22%

$5,891

12%

18%

17%

44%

2

Johnson & Johnson

$27,471

16%

$4,167

36%

15%

14%

26%

3

Bristol-Myers Squibb

$20,222

11%

$4,167

33%

21%

24%

48%

4

Pfizer

$16,204

10%

$3,179

-5%

20%

15%

36%

5

American Home Products*

$13,550

1%

-$1,227

-150%

-9%

-5%

-20%

6

Abbott Laboratories

$13,178

6%

$2,446

5%

19%

17%

33%

7

Warner-Lambert

$12,929

27%

$1,733

38%

13%

15%

34%

8

Eli Lilly & Co

$10,003

0%

$2,721

30%

27%

21%

54%

9

Schering-Plough

$9,176

14%

$2,110

20%

23%

23%

41%

10

Pharmacia & Upjohn

$7,253

7%

$803

16%

11%

8%

14%

11

Amgen

$3,340

23%

$1,096

27%

33%

27%

36%

12

Allergan

$1,406

11%

$188

NA

13%

14%

30%

Total

$167,446

$27,274

Median

$13,054

11%

$2,278

20%

18%

16%

35%

Source: Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com).

* American Home Products recorded a litigation charge of $4.8 billion in the third quarter of 1999 to provide for the expected paymentsto a nationwide, class action settlement brought against AHP regarding the use of the antiobesity products Redux and Pondimin.


wpeC.jpg (54347 bytes)

Source: Public Citizen update of Stephen W. Schondelmeyer calculation, Competition and Pricing Issues in the Pharmaceutical Market, PRIME Institute, University of Minnesota based on data found in Fortune Magazine, 1958 to 1999; Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com).


wpeD.jpg (53739 bytes)

Source: Public Citizen update of Stephen W. Schondelmeyer calculation, Competition and Pricing Issues in the Pharmaceutical Market, PRIME Institute, University of Minnesota based on data found in Fortune Magazine, 1958 to 1999; Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com).


wpeE.jpg (39365 bytes)

Source: Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com).


wpeF.jpg (50727 bytes)

Source: Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com); 1999 Company Annual Reports
.


Fortune 500 Drug Companies - Comparison of 1999 Revenue
Dedicated to Profits, R&D, and Marketing/Administration

 

Rank

Company

Revenues (millions $)

Profits (millions $)

Profits as % of Revenue

R&D
(millions $)

R&D as
% of Revenue

Marketing & Admin.
(millions $)

Marketing/Admin. as % of Revenue

1

Merck

$32,714

$5,891

18.0%

$2,068

6.3%

$5,200

15.9%

2

Johnson & Johnson

$27,471

$4,167

15.2%

$2,600

9.5%

$10,503

38.2%

3

Bristol-Myers Squibb

$20,222

$4,167

20.6%

$1,843

9.1%

$4,578

22.6%

4

Pfizer

$16,204

$3,179

19.6%

$2,776

17.1%

$6,351

39.2%

5

American Home Products*

$13,550

-$1,227

-9.1%

$1,740

12.8%

$5,040

37.2%

6

Abbott Laboratories

$13,178

$2,446

18.6%

$1,194

9.1%

$2,857

21.7%

7

Warner-Lambert

$12,929

$1,733

13.4%

$1,259

9.7%

$5,959

46.1%

8

Eli Lilly & Co

$10,003

$2,721

27.2%

$1,784

17.8%

$2,758

27.6%

9

Schering-Plough

$9,176

$2,110

23.0%

$1,191

13.0%

$3,434

37.4%

10

Pharmacia & Upjohn

$7,253

$803

11.1%

$1,434

19.8%

$2,800

38.6%

11

Amgen

$3,340

$1,096

32.8%

$823

24.6%

$654

19.6%

12

Allergan

$1,406

$188

13.0%

$168

11.9%

$588

41.8%

Total

$167,446

$27,274

$18,880

$50,722

Median

$13,054

$2,278

18.3%

$1,587

12.4%

$4,006

37.3%

Source: Fortune Magazine, April 2000, Fortune 500 (www.fortune.com); 1999 Company Annual Reports.
* American Home Products recorded a litigation charge of $4.8 billion in the third quarter of 1999 to provide for the expected payments in a nationwide, class action settlement brought against AHP regarding the use of the antiobesity products Redux and Pondimin.


 



more resources


 

    » congress | reform | archives


Because Public Citizen does not accept funds from corporations, professional associations or government agencies, we can remain independent and follow the truth wherever it may lead. But that means we depend on the generosity of concerned citizens like you for the resources to fight on behalf of the public interest. If you would like to help us in our fight, click here.


Join | Contact PC | Contribute | Site Map | Careers/Internships| Privacy Statement