Bookmark and Share

 

CLIMATE AND ENERGY

» Clean Energy

» Affordable Energy

» Clean, Affordable Transportation

» Dirty Coal

» Nuclear Relapse



Call to Action

Tell Congress to Reject Efforts to Undermine the Clean Air Act.

Additional Resources

Interactive Map of Proposed New Reactors
Energy Blog
Join our Facebook page

Public Citizen | Wackenhut Conflict of Interest - Wackenhut Conflict of Interest

Wackenhut Conflict of Interest

On June 9, 2004, the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), an industry lobbying group and trade association, hired the Wackenhut Corporation, a private security firm, to manage and provide personnel for “force-on-force” mock terrorist attack exercises at all 103 nuclear plants in the U.S.  These tests are one of the most important ways to ensure that security at our country’s nuclear plants is capable of defending against realistic terrorist threats.

Unfortunately, the tests have been compromised by a conflict of interest.  Wackenhut, the company conducting the security tests, also provides the security guards at almost half the country’s nuclear plants.  There is a strong motivation for Wackenhut-employed pretend terrorists to go soft when simulating an attack, and to let the Wackenhut-employed plant guards “win.”  If they are shown to be a weak guard force, Wackenhut may lose its contracts for guarding nuclear plants, as happened at the Indian Point nuclear plant near New York City.

Without assurance that the results of the force-on-force exercises accurately reflect the true capabilities of the guards to defend against a determined, well-trained, well-armed, and suicidal group of terrorists, they are worthless.  Worse, overly confident results can lull us into a false sense of security.

Public Citizen, along with other organizations such as the Project on Government Oversight, the Union of Concerned Scientists, the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, and the Service Employees International Union, have called on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to reject NEI’s hiring of Wackenhut to perform force-on-force tests.  NRC would never be allowed to hire Wackenhut themselves: federal regulations (48 CFR 2009.5) prohibit awarding a contract to a private company if there is an "organizational conflict of interest."  NRC should not simply delegate its authority to a private industry organization in order to skirt the law. 

Either another company should be hired to perform the security exercises, or, if a suitable company cannot be found, NRC should establish its own federal force.  This would not cost any more and would not require use of taxpayer funds; NRC derives over 90% of its budget from fees charged to the nuclear industry, and could simply charge the estimated $4.3 million expense to the nuclear industry, which is already paying millions to Wackenhut.

NRC and the nuclear industry must begin taking the threat of terrorism against nuclear plants seriously, and stop treating it as a bottom-line issue.

Copyright © 2010 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.  Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.