• Oil, Natural Gas, and Electric Deregulation



• Stopping the Nuclear Relapse



• Interactive Map of Proposed New Reactors



• The Case Against Nuclear Power



• The Case for Renewables and Efficiency



• Energy Legislation



• Press Room



• Congressional Voting Records



• Take Action!

Fact Sheets:

» (7/22/09) Protecting Working Families in Climate Change Legislation [86 KB] » (6/20/07) Senate Energy Bill: Underwhelming Approach to Sustainable Energy Policy [67 KB] » (1/30/07) Analysis of Nuclear Subsidies in Lieberman-McCain Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act of 2007 [32 KB] » (9/20/05) Myths and Facts about Oil Refineries in the United States » (6/19/05) Energy Bill: Billions More in Taxpayer Handouts to the Failed Nuclear Industry [54 KB] » (5/16/05) Section-by-Section Analysis of Key Provisions Affecting Consumers in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Senate Draft, May 10, 2005 [89 KB] » (5/13/05) Section-by-Section Analysis of Key Provisions Affecting Consumers in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Senate Draft, June 8, 2005 » (4/18/05) Nuclear Giveaways in House Energy Bill » (4/12/05) PUHCA at Work Protecting Consumers in 2005 [73 KB] » (3/18/05) Nuclear Power Is Not Clean or Green! » (3/14/05) Supposedly “Tight” FY06 Budget Wastes Taxpayer Money on Nuclear Power Industry » (10/6/04) Tax Breaks Benefiting Energy Companies in the Corporate Tax Bill, HR 4520 » (6/17/04) Summary of Rep. Chris Bell's Ethics Complaint Concerning Tom DeLay's Role in the Westar Bribery Scandal [87 KB] » (4/20/04) Electric Reliability Act of 2004 (S. 2236) » (4/19/04) Amendment Providing $2.2 Billion in Tax Breaks for the Power Industry Won't Help Reliability » (4/6/04) Analysis of Senate Energy Tax Package [9 KB] » (4/6/04) Senate Energy Tax Package Provides Handouts to Robber Barons » (2/25/04) Nuclear Giveaways Remain in “New” Energy Bill (S. 2095) » (2/24/04) An Analysis of PUHCA in the Energy Bill (S. 2095) » (2/16/04) Hitchin’ a Ride: Pork Projects in the Energy Bill » (1/20/04) Energy Bill Offers Licensing Favors for Multinational Energy Consortium’s Proposed Uranium Enrichment Plant » (1/15/04) New Bush Administration Mining Regulations To Destroy Water Quality » (1/7/04) Campaign Contributions to Key Members of Congress from Petrochemical Companies Benefitting from MTBE Product Liability Waiver [7 KB] » (11/20/03) Hitchin’ a Ride: Pork Projects in the Energy Bill » (11/18/03) Analysis of Electricity Title (XII) in Omnibus Energy Bill (H.R.6) » (11/18/03) S. 2095: Still A Special Interest Smorgasbord » (10/31/03) Price-Anderson Reauthorization in H.R.6: An Insurance Scam for the Nuclear Industry » (10/31/03) Taxpayer Financing for New Nuclear Power Plants in HR.6: Corporate Welfare for the Commercial Nuclear Industry » (10/31/03) The “Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative” in H.R.6: Increasing Nuclear Waste Risks » (10/16/03) A Responsible Alternative: Electric Reliability Security Act of 2003 (S.1754) » (10/3/03) I Don’t Want My MTBE: GOP Protects Fuel Additive Manufacturers Despite Drinking Water Contamination » (9/24/03) POLLUTER PAYOFF: Energy Industry Contributions to Members of the House-Senate Energy Bill Conference Committee » (9/9/03) Members of the House-Senate Energy Bill Conference Committee » (9/4/03) Energy Bill Watch List: Spotlight on House-Senate Energy Conference in Wake of Electricity Blackout, Scandals in Energy Industry » (9/3/03) The Advanced Hydrogen Reactor Co-generation Project: A Clean Energy Travesty » (8/28/03) Comparison of Energy Legislation in the 108th Congress [23 KB] » (8/22/03) Drilling for Tax Credits in H.R.6: Runaway Coalbed Methane Development Doesn’t Need a Tax Break » (8/22/03) PUHCA Repeal in H.R.6: Congress Prepares to Abandon Consumer & Investor Protections » (7/29/03) Analysis: Domenici's Electricity Title Amendment to Senate Energy Bill Still Spells Disaster for Consumers, Economy » (7/2/03) Drilling for tax credits: Runaway coalbed methane development doesn’t need a tax break [46 KB] » (6/10/03) Federal Loan Guarantees to the Nuclear Industry Are Sure to Burn a $14 to $16 Billion Hole in the Taxpayer’s Pocket [46 KB] » (6/10/03) Nuclear Industry Boasts Billions in Revenues Yet Requests Taxpayers to Further Subsidize Cost of Doing Business [44 KB] » (6/10/03) Senate Energy Bill Grants Unparalleled Subsidies for New Reactors [50 KB] » (6/10/03) The Senate Energy Bill Authorizes the Federal Government to Buy Power Back from Newly Built Plants—Potentially at Above Market Rates [45 KB] » (6/10/03) The Senate Energy Bill Leaves Taxpayers Liable for High-risk Loans and Potential Cost Over-runs in Nuclear Construction Projects [47 KB] » (5/29/03) BOONDOGGLE: Non-Partisan Congressional Budget Office Predicts Default on Nuke Loans in Senate Energy Bill » (5/29/03) Permanent Price-Anderson Reauthorization in S.14: An Insurance Scam for the Nuclear Industry » (5/29/03) PUHCA Repeal in S.14: Congress Prepares to Abandon Consumer & Investor Protections » (5/29/03) Subsidies for New Reactors in S.14: Corporate Welfare for the Commercial Nuclear Industry » (5/29/03) The “Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative” in S.14: Increasing Nuclear Waste Risks » (3/26/03) Nuclear Provisions in House Energy Bill Are an Atomic Waste! [41 KB] » (4/1/02) Now More Than Ever, Consumers Need Protection—not More Energy Deregulation [423 KB] » (3/21/02) Now More Than Ever, Consumers Need Protection—not More Energy Deregulation

more resources

Because Public Citizen does not accept funds from corporations, professional associations or government agencies, we can remain independent and follow the truth wherever it may lead. But that means we depend on the generosity of concerned citizens like you for the resources to fight on behalf of the public interest. If you would like to help us in our fight, click here.