Take Action Publications Press Room About Public Citizen Public Citizen Divisions Home
Promoting a sustainable energy future

JOIN US! |Take Action | Publications | About Energy Program | Contact Us
Search

For Keyword(s)
advanced search

Email Signup

Sign up for our free activist updates.

Printer friendly pageEmail to a friend

Civil Society Counters the Water Policies of the Inter-American Development Bank

For more information, comments and interviews, contact:

“We demand a change in IDB policies”

LIMA, PERU - Supported in a recent review of the IADB loan portfolio in water and sanitation, undertaken by Public Citizen’s Water for All campaign[1], on March 30 at 11 a.m. at the intersection of Avenida Aviacion and San Borja Norte, Latin American civil society groups will have a press conference about the IADB water policies.

·  Some of the largest IADB loans during 1996-2003 went directly to transnational water companies after they were granted concessions in Argentina, Bolivia and Honduras.  A loan to International Water Services, a Bechtel joint venture, is pending in Ecuador for the Guayaquil concession.

·  A large proportion of IADB loans promote so-called reform of the water and sanitation sector that is based on changing legal and institutional arrangements so that private sector investment in the water and sanitation sector will be secure and profitable. These policies do not take into account that water is a natural resource, a public good, and an inalienable human right, precisely because it is indispensable for human health and life.

·  A large number of IADB loans have stark conditions that require states, provinces or municipalities to open the door to private sector participation in order to be eligible for IADB loans. However, communities and citizen groups who depend on this basic natural resource are not permitted to participate in the decisions and rarely benefit from the policies.

The model of water privatization involving large transnational water companies has been a failure in many cities around the world including Manila, San Juan, Jakarta, Buenos Aires, Atlanta, Cochabamba, Dakar and many others.  Key problems include unaffordable consumer water rates, cut-offs in service, water pollution, major issues of contract incompliance, and when the company in unable to recover sufficient profits, international lawsuits that pass the debt to the government. Given this proven track record of failure it is irresponsible for the IADB to continue pushing this model in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The construction of dams, hydro-electric projects, highways and the promotion of plans to colonize the ecosystem, develop agro-industrial projects based in the use of chemicals, pesticides, and herbicides, are all part of this unsustainable, unequal and exclusive model of development supported by our governments and financed by the IADB. This development model has showed a great capacity to destroy the eco-system and our water sources.

   We demand the following:

·  Stop all IADB loans to major transnational water companies.  There are more than a billion people worldwide that lack access to basic water services.  The transnational water companies have proven themselves UNABLE to put this need above the profit motive.  IADB resources must be placed in hands that can address this vital public health need and that recognize that water is a human right, not a commodity.

·  Remove loan conditions that require private sector participation.   There is no proven track record that shows that the private sector is more successful in providing water services.  In fact, there is considerable evidence to the contrary.  Given this situation, all options must be considered and developed with the full participation of civil society including trade unions, public health, women’s organizations, religious, human rights groups, environmental groups, consumer groups and others.

·  End loans that reform legal and institutional structures to permit private sector participation.  In many countries there is urgent need for institutional reforms that provide the water and sanitation sector with more independence from political influence, that provide for citizen participation and oversight in the water sector, that ensure efficiency, transparency and accountability to water users, that protect water as a human right, and work toward universal access to clean and affordable water.  These are the kinds of reforms that the IADB should be supporting.

·   Begin right here in Peru.  Remove the conditions from loan PE-0142 “Programa de Apoyo al Desarrollo del Sector Saneamiento” that require municipalities to demonstrate private sector participation before they have access to the funds.  Revise this loan in consultation with concerned civil society organizations including trade unions, consumer groups, public health groups, neighborhood associations, environmental groups and others.

·  It is urgent that the IADB stop financing infrastructure projects and development projects that are unsustainable for the eco-system. The IADB should: a) finance initiatives that protect our water sources, b) promote a broad plan of restoration of water resources and soil erosion, c) establish independent monitoring of all projects to ensure compliance, and d) pay the real cost of the social and environmental impacts that IADB projects cause in local communities.

TABLE I

Inter-American Development Bank Water and Sanitation Sector

LOANS PROMOTING PRIVATIZATION 1996-2003*

Country & Date

Loan Amount

Description

Critical Analysis

Argentina   - loan approved 1996

$85 million loan directly to private sector company, main shareholder is transnational Suez.

This loan went directly to a joint venture company, major shareholder is the transnational water company Suez, to fund the operations of a 30-year concession in the Province of Santa Fe.

Major transnational water companies don’t need loans from the IADB.   No public sector options were considered.  8 years later the privatization is a disaster, the company has defied the most basic terms of the contract.

Argentina – loan approved 1997

$1.2 million to Ministry of Public Works, Province of Santa Fe

Develop regulatory framework to oversee the private concession, build capacity of regulatory agency, ENRESS.

This has been unsuccessful. There are major issues of contract incompliance. In 2001 informal plebiscite of citizen groups voted to end the contract.

Argentina – loan approved 1998

$2 million to Ministry of Public Works, Buenos Aires.

Support establishment and start-up of regulatory agency, ORBAS.

This has been unsuccessful. There are major issues of contract incompliance.

Argentina – loan approved 1999

$360 million loan directly to private sector company, main shareholder is transnational water company, Suez.

This loan went directly to fund a joint venture company, major shareholder is the transnational water company Suez, to fund a 30-year concession contract in Buenos Aires

Major transnational water companies do not need IADB loans.   No public sector options were considered. The size of this loan dwarfs most IADB lending in the water sector!

Brazil – loan approved 2002

$95.2 million to public water company in Goias, Brazil (SANEAGO)

This loan was to upgrade the water and sewerage system in Goias, Brazil.

Loan condition requires opening the company to private sector bidding for management contract. No public sector options mentioned.

Bolivia –1996

$1.3 million for water sector superintendency (SSA).

This loan was to develop the legal, regulatory and institutional framework for private concessions in La Paz and Cochabamba.

This loan developed the pre-conditions for Bechtel’s privatization disaster in Cochabamba. 

Bolivia – loan approved 1998

$15 million to fund the private sector consortium led by French transnational, Suez.

This loan was to fund the 30-year concession contract in La Paz, Bolivia to expand and rehabilitate the water services network.

Major transnational water companies do not need IADB loans.   (Should we mention that office in El Alto was burnt down?)

Chile –loan approved 1999

$2.8 to strengthen regulatory capacity of Superintendencia de Servicios Sanitarios (SISS)

Chile auctioned off major urban water companies to private sector in 1998 generating new need for regulatory capacity.

Domestic regulatory agencies are rarely on level playing field with transnational corporations.

Ecuador – loan approved 1997

$40 million loan for Guayaquil Water and Sewer Authority (ECAPAG)

This loan funded the rehabilitation and upgrade of the public water company in preparation for privatization.

Conditions in the loan required the downsizing of employees and the preparation of the bidding document for the privatization.

Ecuador –  loan proposed in 2003 (not yet approved)

$50 million loan to private sector company, International Water Services (Bechtel joint venture).

International Water Services won concession in Guayaquil in 2000.  This loan will fund operation, expansion and rehabilitation of water services in Guayaquil.

Concession agreement grants Bechtel “exclusive rights” to water in concession area, right to open or close wells, and right to sell bulk water to third parties.

El Salvador – loan approved 1998

$2.4 million to various government water sector agencies

The loan provides management advice and technical cooperation for decentralization and restructuring of water sector and the formulation of a regulatory framework to prepare for privatization.

Loan conditions require preparation for water and sanitation system to be granted to private company in concession agreement.   No other options considered.

Honduras – loan approved 1999

$26 million   to be disbursed to municipalities

The loan will provide funding to municipalities to reform potable water services and create regulatory framework to permit commercial service.

Loan conditions include requirement to impose tariff structure that reflects full economic cost of potable water service.

Honduras – loan approved 2002

$13.7 million loan to joint venture private company, main partner Acea S.P.A.

In 2000, Acea S.P.A. and partners won 30-year concession contract to operate water and sewer service in San Pedro Sula.

Transnational water companies don’t need IADB loans.

Dominican Republic – loan approved 1999

$1.08 million to central government water reform agency.

This loan will develop new institutional and legal framework to facilitate private sector participation.

Loan designed to promote private sector participation. No other options discussed.

Peru – loan proposed in 2002, not yet approved

$50 million to be disbursed through PROINVERSION

This loan makes funds available to municipalities only if they involve the private sector in financing or managing the water system.

Loan conditions include the requirement of private sector participation. The cases of Piura and Tumbes have been selected as the first to concession.

*Not all project documents were made available to the researcher.   The analysis includes only water & sanitation loan documents made available.


[1]Public Citizen is a non profit US organization that works in defense of consumers and to reduce the corporation control in the human basic services like water, food and energy.  www.citizen.org please, see details from the study on table 1.



more resources

 

    » cmep | Water | cmep Water | reports | peru


Because Public Citizen does not accept funds from corporations, professional associations or government agencies, we can remain independent and follow the truth wherever it may lead. But that means we depend on the generosity of concerned citizens like you for the resources to fight on behalf of the public interest. If you would like to help us in our fight, click here.


Join | Contact PC | Contribute | Site Map | Careers/Internships| Privacy Statement