For the pdf of the actual letter, see: http://www.citizen.org/documents/Congressional-Letter-to-USTR-on-TPP-and-Access-to-Medicines(October2011).pdf

For the full press release, see:  http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?q=news/democratic-leaders-underscore-importance-of-upholding-us-commitment-to-advancing-agreement-that (links to democrats.energycommerce.house.gov)

For an article from "The Hill" on this letter, see: http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/medical-devices-and-prescription-drug-policy-/188611-house-democrats-urge-quick-access-to-generic-drugs-in-pending-trade-deal (links to thehill.com)

For more on the Trans-Pacific FTA, see: http://www.citizen.org/more-about-trans-pacific-FTA

October 19, 2011

The Honorable Ron Kirk
United States Trade Representative
600 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20508

Dear Ambassador Kirk:

As you start the next round of negotiations in Peru on the intellectual property chapter of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), we are writing to underscore the importance of upholding the U.S. commitment to advancing an agreement that safeguards access to medicines in the developing world.

We are concerned that some of the goals and approaches described as part of the new strategic initiative Trade Enhancing Access to Medicines (TEAM)[1] could limit, rather than expand, access to medicines in poor countries. For example, we are concerned that the seemingly laudable goal of “driving” rather than “allowing” access to medicines, as exemplified in the so-called “TPP access window,” would instead simply result in further delays in marketing of generic medicines.

The best way to preserve our developing country trade partners’ access to medicines is to incorporate into the TPP the Bipartisan Agreement on Trade Policy of May 10, 2007.[2] The May 10 agreement, which was incorporated into Free Trade Agreements (FTA) with Peru, Colombia, and Panama, included a number of key modifications from prior FTAs “aimed at further ensuring that developing country free trade agreement partners are able to achieve an appropriate balance between fostering innovation in, and promoting access to, life-saving medicine.”[3] A core objective of these changes was to ensure that FTA obligations do not put patients in poor countries in a position in which they could have to wait longer than patients in the United States to obtain affordable life saving generic medicines.

Among the key changes, exclusive marketing rights based on clinical trial data were limited to one five-year period that could run concurrently with such protection in the United States. In addition, the FTA requirement to grant patent extensions became optional and regulatory authorities were given greater freedom to approve generic medicines by having patent disputes resolved through the legal system instead of the drug approval process. Furthermore, language was incorporated to make clear that our FTAs do not and should not prevent countries from taking measures to protect public health by promoting access to medicines for all. All these changes were designed to promote greater access to the necessary life saving drugs while maintaining adequate incentive for continued innovation.

Maintaining the flexibility provided by the May 10 provisions is critical for those TPP partners in the developing world that cannot afford to protect the public health. This includes Peru, which should not be pressured to give up the May 10 flexibilities contained in its existing FTA with the United States, and Vietnam, where an estimated 290,000 people are living with HIV/AIDS. The U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) supports 31,000 of the only 37,995 who are receiving anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment.[4] There would be significant concern if action through TPP could delay access to generic medicines which may result in higher costs to the U.S. government to reach PEPFAR treatment goals or could result in removing patients from treatment. Since Fiscal Year 2004, PEPFAR has spent over $323 million in Vietnam to support comprehensive HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care and the UN Global Fund, which also receives U.S. government support, currently contributes approximately $27 million per year.[5] We cannot squander this investment.

The strain of rising pharmaceutical costs also extends to non-communicable diseases, the leading causes of preventable death and disability responsible for over 60% of global deaths, 80% of which occur in developing countries.[6] Millions of people today in the developing world lack access to life-saving medicines. An expert commissioned by the United Nations has estimated that “improving access to existing medicines could save 10 million lives each year. Access to medicines is characterized by profound global inequality: fifteen percent of the world’s population consumes over ninety percent of the world’s pharmaceuticals.”[7] It is essential that our trade agreements enable our partners in the developing world to address these growing challenges.

Thank you for attention to this important issue. As TPP negotiations move forward, we look forward to working with you to preserve key medicines-related aspects of the May 10 Agreement necessary for developing countries.

Sincerely,

Henry A. Waxman
Ranking Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce

Sander M. Levin
Ranking Member
Committee n Ways and Means

John Conyers, Jr.
Ranking Member
Committee on the Judiciary

Jim McDermott
Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Trade
Committee on Ways and Means



[1] Office of the United States Trade Representative, Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Goals to Enhance Access to Medicines, September 2011 (online at http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/3059).

[2] Office of the United States Trade Representative, Bipartisan Agreement on Trade Policy, May 2007 (online at http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/factsheets/2007/asset_upload_file127_11319.pdf)

[3] Id.

[4] See U.S. Department of State, Partnership to Fight HIV/AIDS in Vietnam (online at http://www.pepfar.gov/countries/vietnam/index.htm) and The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, VietnamGrant Portfolio (online at http://portfolio.theglobalfund.org/country/index/vtn?lang=en).

[5] See Id.

[6] See World Health Organization, Moscow Declaration Preamble, First Global Ministerial Conference on Healthy Lifestyles and Noncommunicable Disease Control, April 2011 (online at http://www.un.org/en/ga/president/65/issues/moscow_declaration_en.pdf).

[7] UN News Centre, UN Rights Expert Unveils Draft Guidelines for Drug Companies on Vital Medicines,UN News Centre, Oct.25, 2007.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.