Copyright Issues & TPP in Malaysia

October 9, 2013-The IP Exporter: The Trans Pacific Partnership and Its Implications on Online Copyright Enforcement

September 12, 2013-
Malaysia and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)

August 26, 2013-
Global Post: Malaysia should abandon TPP talks, ex-PM Mahathir says

July 17, 2013-
Ministry of International Trade and Industry: Malaysia Yet To Decide On TPPA - Mustapa (links to miti.gov.my)

April 15, 2013
-Malaysians must reject the US trade deal (links to ftamalaysia.org)

April 15, 2013-FTA Malaysia: What's wrong with the TPPA (links to ftamalaysia.org)

March 15, 2013-Digital News Asia: How the Trans-Pacific Partnership threatens online rights and freedoms (links to digitalnewsasia.com)

January 19, 2013-Electronic Frontiers Foundation: Copyright in Malaysia and the Fight for a Positive International IP Agenda (links to eff.org)


September 13, 2012
-Malaysians Must Know the Truth: Malaysia & TPP Agreement (links to malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogspot.de)

September 13, 2012-Asia Times: Malaysia risks takeover (links to atimes.com)

September 12, 2012-Free Malaysia Today: TPP: America's hidden agenda (links to freemalaysiatoday.com)

September 12, 2012-Asia Times Online: Malaysia and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (links to globalresearch.ca)

August 14, 2012
-Zeropaid: Malaysia Rejecting TPP as Agreement Causes Political Turmoil in Australia (links to zeropaid.com)




Copyright Issues & the TPP in Malaysia


According to leaked text on limitations and exceptions, Malaysian negotiators have supported a proposal that would allow signatory countries to implement limitations and exceptions to copyright in accordance with domestic laws. Many civil society groups, including members of the Fair Deal Coalition, have expressed support for this position, which has been staunchly opposed by both the US and Australia.

 

[NZ/CL/MY/BN/VN propose; AU/US oppose93: 1. Each party may provide for limitations and exceptions to copyrights, related rights, and legal protections for technological protections measures and rights management information included in this Chapter, in accordance with its domestic laws and relevant international treaties that each are party to.]

...

[NZ/CL/MY/BN/VN propose; US/AU oppose: Paragraph 1 permits a party to carry forward and appropriately extend into the digital environment limitations and exceptions in its domestic laws. Similarly, these provisions permit a Party to devise new] [US/AU propose; NZ/CL/MY/BN/VN oppose: its understood that each party may, consistent with the foregoing, adopt or maintain] exceptions and limitations for the digital environment.]

--Excerpt from leaked TPP text on copyright limitations & exceptions

However, Malaysia’s position on copyright issues in the TPP has been undermined by recent changes to its copyright law. In 2012, Malaysia amended Copyright Act 1987 to include tougher penalties for infringers, with damages of up to six figures and tougher digital lock protections. This change was purportedly, at least in part, a response to pressure exerted on the government by the USTR. In 2011, the USTR placed Malaysia on the Special 301 Watch List despite having made efforts towards protecting intellectual property.

 "Malaysia remains on the Watch List. Malaysia continues to make positive progress with respect to the protection and enforcement of IPR. In 2010, Malaysia introduced amendments to its copyright law that intended to, among other things, implement the WIPO Internet Treaties and prohibit unauthorized camcording of motion pictures in theaters…Nonetheless, enforcement efforts are hampered by a lack of follow-up investigations and effective prosecutions. Pirated and counterfeit products continue to be widely available in Malaysia, and book piracy remains a significant problem."


-Excerpt from 2011 Special 301 Report



Following the 2012 amendment, USTR removed the country from the list as a result of the changes to the copyright regime.

 “Malaysia passed copyright amendments that significantly strengthen its protection of copyrights and its enforcement against piracy....in recognition of Malaysia’s recent improved efforts with respect to IPR protection and enforcement, the United States has removed Malaysia from the Watch List. The United States will continue to work closely with Malaysia to ensure that progress is sustained and to address our remaining areas of concern, including through the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations.”


-Excerpt from 2012 Special 301 Report


Despite having introduced some more stringent copyright protections, the Malaysian government has attempted to maintain a certain level of balance in its legislation. For example, the 2012 amendment actually broadened copyright fair deal exceptions in addition to introducing a new exception for temporary electronic copies. As well, the amendment limited the liability of service providers in cases of infringement. In addition, some of the proposed measures pushed by the United States were simply too politically contentious to pass through the Malaysian parliament. For example, it was proposed that possession of a single copy of infringing content should be a criminal offense, even making landlords of an establishment where it was sold liable.



For more information, visit our partner organizations in Malaysia






The TPP Will Also Affect Access to Medicines and Innovation in Malaysia: Find out more

Back to Copyright in the TPP - Country Pages


Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.