» Corporate Power

» Jobs, Wages and Economic Outcomes

» Food Safety

» Access to Affordable Medicines

» Corporate-rigged “Trade” Pacts

» Alternatives to Corporate Globalization

» Other Issues

Trade Data Center

One-stop shop for searchable trade databases, case lists & more

Eyes on Trade

Global Trade Watch blog on trade & globalization. Subscribe to RSS.

Debunking Trade Myths

To hide the facts about failed trade policies, proponents are changing the data

Connect with GTW

What's New – Global Trade Watch

  • April 25: REPORT: Trump's First 100 Days: Federal Contracting with Corporate Offshorers Continues (PDF)
  • April 25: Press Release: New Report Reveals Trump Is Not Punishing Corporations that Offshore American Jobs, but Awarding Them New Government Contracts

View 'What's New' Archives

New Memo Shows WTO Roots of Financial Crisis

The WTO's General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS): Implications for Regulation of Financial Services in the U.S.

Posted: 10/21/2008

Deregulation of the financial service sector – including banking, insurance, asset management, pension funds, securities, financial information, and financial advisory services – has been among the most important, but least discussed aspects of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) agenda since its 1995 inception. As part of its original WTO commitments, the United States agreed to conform a broad array of financial services to comply with regulatory limits established in the WTO’s General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). Given the decade-plus push by various financial service firms to roll back domestic regulation, some of the U.S. WTO commitments simply locked into place existing policies. In other cases, for instance regarding the “firewall” policies established in the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act that forbade bank holding companies from operating other financial services, U.S. WTO commitments that contradicted domestic policy were used to push for domestic revocation of existing laws. The United States then used ongoing WTO financial service negotiations to export the U.S. model of extreme financial service deregulation to the other 100-plus WTO signatory countries, including through a 1999 WTO Financial Service Agreement (FSA).

...In the final analysis, the WTO agreements have more to do with governance than with trade. Over the past century, U.S. financial regulation has shifted from strict financial controls over banking and capital markets following the Great Depression, to periods of deregulation in the 1980s and 1990s. The WTO GATS locks in the U.S. status quo at a time of unprecedented financial liberalization, and exports this model worldwide. Whether this extreme deregulatory model is beneficial to most people – or sustainable – is a highly contested question. By imposing the model worldwide, the WTO GATS subjects millions of people to becoming unwilling guinea pigs in a radical policy experiment. And, if the experiment goes bad, and absent changes to these international commercial agreements, governments worldwide could face daunting difficulties if they seek to reverse the trend toward financial service deregulation.

Read the full memo here (PDF).

Learn More

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.