» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing


Read our outrages

If you're not outraged,
you're not paying attention!

Read what Public Citizen has to say about the biggest blunders and outrageous offenses in the world of public health, published monthly in Health Letter.

Outrage of the Month: False and Misleading TV Drug Ads

December 2013

Michael Carome, M.D.

Anyone who watches television, particularly nightly news broadcasts or major sporting events, has witnessed the endless onslaught of advertisements for prescription and over-the-counter drugs. Of note, the U.S. is one of only two countries (the other being New Zealand) that allows such direct-to-consumer advertising for drugs.

An important consideration for consumers — as well as health care providers and government regulators — is the degree of accuracy of the key claims made in these advertisements. A study published online in September 2013 in the Journal of General Internal Medicine (JGIM) suggests that such claims are too often either misleading or simply false.

For the JGIM study, researchers carefully analyzed the content of a randomly selected sample of 84 prescription drug ads and 84 over-the-counter drug ads that aired during nightly news broadcasts on ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN from 2008 through 2010. For each ad, the researchers identified the major claim being made and then compared it to the available evidence related to that claim. Each claim was then categorized as either objectively true, potentially misleading or false. The types of potentially misleading claims included exaggerations beyond the available evidence, omissions of important information and opinions.

The researchers determined that of the most-emphasized claims made in the sample of 168 drug ads analyzed, 33 percent were objectively true, 57 percent were potentially misleading and 10 percent were outright false. In other words, two-thirds of these claims were either false or potentially misleading.

For the prescription drug ads, 55 percent of the most-emphasized claims were potentially misleading, and only 2 percent were false. However, for the over-the-counter drug ads, 61 percent of such claims were potentially misleading, and 17 percent were false. Thus, for the latter, a total of more than three-quarters of the ads were found to be false or potentially misleading.

These findings are troubling but certainly not surprising, given the well-documented history of fraud committed by the pharmaceutical industry and the lack of adequate oversight of drug ads by the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Trade Commission, the two federal agencies responsible for regulating such ads.

For consumers, the take-home message is clear: Never rely on television, or any direct-to-consumer advertising, for information regarding any drug.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.