HEALTH AND SAFETY

» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing

 

More Information on the Device Review Process

Letter in New York Times Criticizing Weaknesses in FDA Oversight of Medical Devices

October 28, 2008

Fast Track Treatments for Cancer

To the Editor:

Your article highlights a fast-track system whereby the Food and Drug Administration clears most medical devices simply by declaring them equivalent to existing devices, rather than by direct proof of their effectiveness. In fact, the MammoSite system, a Class II device, is not the most egregious example of this phenomenon.

There are a number of more complex, typically higher-risk Class III devices (including some heart bypass machines and pacemakers) that have gained F.D.A. clearance through the same fast-track process detailed in the article.

This practice violates a statutory deadline requiring the F.D.A. to phase out the fast-track approval process for these highest-risk devices by the end of 1995. In the meantime, the companies producing these products continue to avail themselves of the fast-track system, at potentially great risk to public health.

Jonas Hines
Research Associate
Health Research Group at Public Citizen

Eunice Yu
Research Associate
Health Research Group at Public Citizen

Peter Lurie, M.D., M.P.H.
Deputy Director
Health Research Group at Public Citizen

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.