ACCESS TO JUSTICE

» Fair Arbitration

» Patient Safety and Medical Liability

» Preserving State Consumer Laws

» Whistleblower Protections


Sign Up

to receive regular updates on our campaigns for access to justice and consumer protection.


Recent Reports

May 1, 2014 - Cases That Would Have Been
February 27, 2014 - Righting a Financial Wrong
Sept. 20, 2013 - Private Actions, Public Benefits
Aug. 6, 2013 - No Correlation
More - See More Access to Justice Reports

No Correlation

Continued Decrease in Medical Malpractice Payments Debunks Theory That Litigation Is to Blame for Soaring Medical Costs

August 6, 2013 — A decade after reaching their peak, the quantity and cumulative value of medical malpractice payments made on behalf of doctors were at their lowest level on record in 2012, according to a new Public Citizen analyzing data from the federal government’s National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB).

The facts surrounding the prevalence of medical malpractice litigation are important for several reasons, the report contends.

Medical malpractice has been singled out by many in Congress as the culprit for rising health care costs. Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress have made it a perennial priority to pass legislation what would restrict patients’ ability to seek redress in court. The facts clearly contradict contentions that malpractice litigation significantly influences health care costs. Since 2003, medical malpractice payments have fallen 28.8 percent, yet national health care costs are up 58.2 percent.

Lawmakers intent on serving their constituents should focus on reducing the errors that lead to litigation, not reducing accountability for the errors. Read the report.

Learn More

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.