HEALTH AND SAFETY

» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing



Read our outrages

If you're not outraged,
you're not paying attention!


Read what Public Citizen has to say about the biggest blunders and outrageous offenses in the world of public health, published monthly in Health Letter.

Dangers of Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment

March 2012

Sidney M. Wolfe, M.D.

The cover story this month presents clear evidence against inappropriately-frequent screening for osteoporosis. The more often these tests are done, the more likely it is that many women who do not really have osteoporosis will be herded into using drugs to prevent fractures. The drugs will not help most of them and also have adverse effects.

One of the most important books concerning the dangers of undergoing too many tests for a variety of diseases and conditions is Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health, by Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, an internist and professor of medicine at Dartmouth College. Welch discusses the downside of drug treatment for women who really do not have osteoporosis.

In the book, he reviews a study attempting, with drugs, to increase the bone density of women who have, at the start, near-normal bone density (osteopenia) and who have never had a fracture. The results are best summed up in the example of 100 patients diagnosed with near-normal bone density and treated with osteoporosis-prevention drugs for a lifetime.

  • Winners (treatment saved them from a fracture): 5
  • Treated for Naught (had fractures despite treatment): 44
  • Losers (overdiagnosed: treatment couldn’t help them because they never were going to have fractures): 51

These results show that for every 100 such women, there are only five winners (saved from a fracture) but 95 women who had fractures despite treatment or could not have been helped by treatment because they were not going to have fractures.

Aside from the poor odds, for most such women, of benefiting from drug treatment, there are other downsides. As Dr. Welch points out, referring to bisphosphonates such as alendronate (Fosamax), which increase bone density, “There is some concern about the long-term effects of these drugs; they may actually make bones more brittle by changing the bone architecture. They can also disturb calcium metabolism, lead to ulcers in the esophagus and, very rarely, cause bone to die.”

This is but one of many examples of dangerous overdiagnosis reviewed in this book. Heeding Welch’s clearly written advice will surely help women with near-normal bone density, and others at risk of being overdiagnosed and overtreated for other conditions, avoid the unnecessary tests, drugs, surgeries and anxiety that are the inevitable outcome of our overdiagnosis epidemic.

Copyright © 2013 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.
  Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.