» Alternatives To Corporate Globalization

» Democracy, Sovereignty and Federalism

» Deregulation and Access to Services

» Import Safety, Environment and Health

» Jobs, Wages and Economic Outcomes

» NAFTA, WTO, Other Trade Pacts

» Other Issues

Trade Data Center

One-stop shop for searchable trade databases, case lists & more

Eyes on Trade

Global Trade Watch blog on trade & globalization. Subscribe to RSS.

Debunking Trade Myths

To hide the facts about failed trade policies, proponents are changing the data

Connect with GTW

What's New – Global Trade Watch

View 'What's New' Archives

FTAA Ministerial Quito 2002



On November 1, trade ministers from throughout the Western Hemisphere met in Quito, Ecuador to push negotiations for the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), an expansion of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA to 31 more countries. The FTAA seeks to expand the failed NAFTA model of privatization, deregulation and a "race to the bottom" to the rest of the Western hemisphere. Thousands of citizens from throughout the Americas were in Quito to meet them, protesting the substance of the proposals in the FTAA as well as the secretive, closed negotiation process itself. A broad coalition of Ecuadorian groups united with allies from all over the hemisphere to show the trade negotiators and corporate executives attending the Americas Business Forum and the 7th FTAA Ministerial that ordinary Latin Americans oppose the agreement. The leading National Campesino Social Security Organization (CONFEUNASSC-CNC), the National Indigenous Conferderation (CONAIE), the Andean Indigenous Federation (Ecuarunari), the Ecuadorian Federation of Free Trade Unions (CEOSL) and grassroots environmental groups Acción Ecológica and Cequipus worked together to mobilize people in the country and to promote alternatives to the FTAA "one-size-fits-all" corporate-managed trade model.


Food First

Americas Program (Interhemispheric Resource Center)

Internationally, more than 120 groups from around the hemisphere signed a statement demanding transparency in the FTAA negotiations and a release of a complete draft text (not a "scrubbed" version lacking vital information as was released after the Quebec City Summit of the Americas). However, the the demands of civil society were once again ignored and the official bracketed draft text released shows areas of disagreement between country negotiators, but lacks the crucial information identifying which countries support which positions.

The United States Trade Representatives Office (USTR) press release claims that the FTAA Ministerial was a "mission acomplished," but the final analysis shows that the U.S. returned empty handed from Quito (see analysis by Victor Menotti of the International Forum on Globalization – IFG) thanks in part to the growing resistance to the failed "free" trade NAFTA model in the Americas and all over the world.

The FTAA overlaps with much of the GATS negotiations. The FTAA includes commitments to "liberalize" trade in "services" such as education, energy, healthcare, water, postal services and financial services (including accounting).

The FTAA will also include the NAFTA "investor-to-state" corporate lawsuit provision. Also known as NAFTA "Chapter 11" this provision allows corporations to sue governments in secret tribunals for compensation when domestic regulations (public health, safety, environmental or labor laws) affect profits. To date, the NAFTA Chapter 11 model has allowed corporations to claim over $30 billion from taxpayers!

Related Documents

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.