» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing


Letter in Washington Post Regarding Effectiveness of Needle Exchange Programs

This letter, by Health Research Group Director Sidney Wolfe, M.D., appeared in the Washington Post on February 27, 1997.

An NIH Consensus Conference's recent scientific conclusion about the effectiveness of needle-exchange programs in reducing the spread of diseases such as AIDS referred to the "dangerous chasm" between this finding and public policy in the United States. The Post's Feb. 15 editorial: "Needles and Classroom Candor ,"while stating that "government policies that reject these findings and ignore these preventive steps must be changed," did not mention that although Congress imposed the ban on use of federal funds to pay for needle-exchange programs, further legislative action is not required to allow funding but merely a finding by the secretary of health and human services that needle-exchange programs reduce AIDS transmission and do not increase drug use.

NIH's recent statement was not the first time a government agency or a government-funded study has concluded that needle-exchange programs can decrease the spread of infection without increasing drug use, and thus recommended that the ban prohibiting use of federal funds be lifted. The National Commission on AIDS (1991), the University of California (1993), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1993) and the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences (1995) all reached the same conclusions.

If the medical and scientific evidence is so clear, why does the ban persist? It is increasingly obvious that the "dangerous chasm" between science and policy emanates from policies set in the White House's Office of National Drug Control Policy, whose simplistic mantra of "no drugs" is incompatible with federal funding of needle-exchange programs. A statement on needle-exchange from the drug policy office dated Jan. 31 said that it "will not advocate a Federal policy that is centered on government provision of the tools to support addiction." The statement went on to explain that "needle exchange is neither an adequate substitute for drug treatment nor a preferred means of facilitating entry into drug treatment." There are more than enough official scientific opinions to enable Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala to save thousands of lives by decreeing that the politically motivated anti-scientific ban of federal funding of needle-exchange programs - the "dangerous chasm" has ended.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.