GLOBALIZATION AND TRADE

» Alternatives To Corporate Globalization

» Democracy, Sovereignty and Federalism

» Deregulation and Access to Services

» Import Safety, Environment and Health

» Jobs, Wages and Economic Outcomes

» NAFTA, WTO, Other Trade Pacts

» Other Issues

Trade Data Center

One-stop shop for searchable trade databases, case lists & more

Eyes on Trade

Global Trade Watch blog on globalization & trade. Subscribe to RSS.

Debunking Trade Myths

To hide the facts about failed trade policies, proponents are changing the data

Connect with GTW

What's New - Global Trade Watch


View 'What's New' Archives

Diverse Coalition Urges State Attorneys General To Defend State Constitutional Rights

Coalition Asks AGs to Defend Massachusetts Human Rights Law Against Corporate Constitutional Challenge

WASHINGTON D.C. -- The Ad-hoc Coalition for the Defense of the Massachusetts Burma Law, a diverse coalition of human rights, environmental and labor organizations, is calling on state attorneys general to support a Massachusetts human rights law against a corporate lawsuit. The Massachusetts law, which prohibits the state from doing business with corporations that do business with Burma, is being challenged in U.S. District Court by the National Foreign Trade Council Inc., a corporate coalition which claims that such state sanctions laws are unconstitutional.

"Every state in the Union has an interest in supporting the ability of states to set and keep divestment type laws," said Michael Dolan, Field Director for Public Citizen s Global Trade Watch. "If it were not for state sanctions policies, Nelson Mandela might still be in jail."

The Massachusetts law, part of an international human rights campaign against the brutal dictatorship in Burma, is virtually identical to state and local sanctions laws against South Africa s apartheid regime in the 1980s. Shortly after Massachusetts passed the Burma law in the spring of 1996, Eastman Kodak, Apple Computer, Phillips Electronics and other large corporations pulled out of Burma. Last year, the European Union and Japan initiated a challenge to the Massachusetts law at the World Trade Organization in a case that is still pending.

The Ad-hoc Coalition for the Defense of the Massachusetts Burma Law sent letters to every state attorney general urging them to file amicus briefs in defense of the Massachusetts law. The letters note the April 9, 1986, opinion of the Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, which concludes state sanctions laws like that of Massachusetts "survive constitutional scrutiny."

The Ad-hoc Coalition for the Defense of the Massachusetts Burma Law includes Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, Sierra Club, Center of Concern, Franklin Research and Development, International Labor Rights Fund, Essential Action, Institute for Policy Studies, Campaign for America s Future, Co-op America, Preamble Center for Public Policy, Philadelphia-Burma Roundtable, Food and Allied Services Trades (FAST, AFL-CIO), Friends of the Earth and EarthRights International.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.