» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing


More information on troglitazone (Rezulin)

Letter Requesting a Criminal Investigation of Warner Lambert/Parke Davis

March 14, 2000

Jane Henney, M.D.
Food and Drug Administration
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857

This letter is to request the opening of a criminal investigation of Warner-Lambert/Parke-Davis for what appears to be illegally delaying the submission of a compilation of data known to the company before marketing had begun — clearly showing troglitazone-induced liver toxicity — until after the drug was marketed.

Prior to the marketing of troglitazone in March 1997, Warner-Lambert/Parke-Davis was aware of a significant number of "treatment-emergent" cases in which liver toxicity evolved in people after they were given the drug. These are highly significant adverse reaction data which were compiled as of February 3, 1997 (before marketing was begun) by the company but not submitted to the FDA as a compilation of what was clearly a pattern of drug-induced liver toxicity until October 21, 1997 (6 months after marketing had begun).

On page two of a November 12, 1997 memo by FDA reviewer Robert Misbin, M.D. commenting on this belated submission of compiled data, he states that: "As of February 3 [1997], (from the submission of October 21, 1997) Parke-Davis reported 21 patients with treatment-emergent elevations of transaminases greater than 3x normal which required troglitazone to be discontinued. The maximum ALT [liver enzyme] exceeded 10x ULN [upper limit of normal] in 13/21 cases and exceeded 1000 in 5/21 cases. There are three cases of biopsy-proven hepatitis with peak transaminase levels of 1000 U/L and jaundice in two cases."

This delay in reporting the compilation of these findings is highly significant because had the data been submitted promptly, within 15 days, as required by Federal law, it is likely that the drug would, when first marketed, have had a more serious warning about liver toxicity and would clearly have had instructions to have liver monitoring tests done. It is thus likely that many of the estimated 400 patients who have suffered troglitazone-induced liver failure (as of now, with many cases not reported, there have been 89 cases of liver failure including 61 deaths reported) would have been spared had this compilation of cases been sent to the FDA promptly instead of eight months later. When the drug was first approved and marketed, there was no mention of the seriousness of the liver toxicity nor was there any label instruction to have any liver tests done. Upon belatedly learning in the fall of 1997 of the cases of liver toxicity which had occurred prior to marketing, along with other cases of severe toxicity occurring after marketing, the FDA for the first time, in late October 1997 required the label to be changed to request initial liver testing the first two months of treatment and subsequent tests for a total of five tests in the first year. The October 28, 1997 change in the labeling was as follows:

Dear Healthcare Professional Letter - Labeling Changes


It is recommended that serum transaminase levels be checked within the first one to two months and then every three months during the first year of troglitazone therapy, and periodically thereafter.

In the previous cases of successful criminal prosecution of pharmaceutical companies for temporarily and illegally withholding information from the FDA — Lilly for the arthritis drug Oraflex, SmithKline for the hypertension drug Selacryn and Hoechst for the antidepressant Merital — the drugs were taken off the market. Likewise, troglitazone is a doomed drug and it is only a matter of when, not whether it will come off the market.

I look forward to a prompt response to this request for a criminal prosecution and to this now-third time request to ban this unacceptably dangerous drug.


Sidney M. Wolfe, M.D.
Public Citizen's Health Research Group

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.