» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing


More Information on Ethics and Clinical Trials

Letter in JAMA on Problems with HIV-1 Vaccine Study

This letter, by Health Research Group Deputy Director Peter Lurie, M.D., MPH, and Director Sidney Wolfe, M.D., appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) on May 2, 2001.

To the Editor: We would like to point out that the IRC, which sponsored the study by Dr Kahn and colleagues,[1] has been accused of previous attempts to improperly influence the presentation of scientific data on its HIV-1 Immunogen.

In June 1994, authors from the company published the results of a placebo-controlled trial of this agent. The authors concluded that the vaccine "may ... stabilize the percent of CD4 cell decline."[2]

However, in a January 9, 1995, Warning Letter to the IRC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) noted that 2 subjects had been excluded from the published article even though the article stated that the analysis included all treated patients. Furthermore, the statistical analysis that was conducted was not the one described in the study protocol. The FDA concluded: "As a result of these deviations from protocol, a significant result was published in the article" (J. C. Simmons, Office of Compliance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA, written communication [Warning Letter] to Dennis J. Carlo, IRC, January 9, 1995).

The warning letter also accused the IRC of representing the vaccine prior to approval in a promotional context; failing to follow informed consent regulations; including in its trials at least 31 subjects who did not meet entrance criteria; changing data retroactively for several reports; modifying adverse experience information; and changing data categories retrospectively, after unblinding.

Despite these multiple irregularities, which the FDA described in its warning letter as violations of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and other FDA regulations, 2 FDA advisory committees meeting together voted on January 26, 1995, to approve wider testing of the HIV-1 Immunogen.[3] This subsequent trial resulted in the study reported by Kahn et al.

This story continues to unfold, as the vaccine is currently being advocated as monotherapy for HIV-infected patients in Thailand.[4]

Peter Lurie, M.D., M.P.H.
Sidney M. Wolfe, M.D.
Public Citizen's Health Research Group
Washington, DC



[1] Kahn JO, Cherng DW, Mayer K, Murray H, Lagakos S, for the 806 Investigator Team. Evaluation of HIV-1 immunogen, an immunologic modifier, administered to patients infected with HIV having 300 to 549 x 106/L CD4 cell counts: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;284:2193-2202.

[2] Trauger RJ, Ferre F, Daigle AE, et al. Effect of immunization with inactivated gp 120-depleted human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) immunogen on HIV-1 immunity, viral DNA, and percentage of CD4 cells. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:1256-1264.

[3] Neergard L. FDA panel recommends widespread testing of therapeutic AIDS vaccine [wire service release]. Associated Press. January 27, 1995.

[4] Thaitawat N, Bhatiasevi A. Drive to register drug disturbs health experts. Bangkok Post. April 10, 2000.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.