HEALTH AND SAFETY

» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing

 

More information on gefitinib (Iressa)

Supplement to Petition to Ban Gefitinib (Iressa)

April 28, 2005

Lester Crawford, DVM, Acting Commissioner
Food and Drug Administration
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD  20857 

RE: Supplement to Petition to the FDA to withdraw the lung cancer drug gefitinib (Iressa)

Dear Commissioner Crawford:

Public Citizen, a nationwide consumer organization with a membership of more than 150,000 people, wishes to supplement its March 4, 2005 petition[1] (Docket number 2005P-0094), which called for the immediate removal from the market of  the drug Iressa (gefitinib; AstraZeneca) due to its proven failure to reduce mortality among patients who are getting the drug as second and third line therapy, its failure to improve patients’ quality of life, and its potential to cause serious adverse events including fatal interstitial pneumonia. A newly available government-sponsored clinical trial brings to four the number of studies in which Iressa has failed to reduce mortality.

Iressa was approved under an accelerated approval process (Subpart H), which allows approval based on the surrogate endpoint of tumor shrinkage. However, in an uncontrolled trial, shrinkage occurred in only 10% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed two other chemotherapy regimens. As part of Subpart H, sponsors are required to conduct long-term mortality studies.

On May 1, 2003, Public Citizen asked that Iressa not be approved[2] because, in addition to the minimal 10% response rate, two large Phase III trials (INTACT 1 and 2) with Iressa as first-line therapy (no treatment prior to Iressa) completed before drug approval were clearly negative with respect to survival.

On December 17, 2004, FDA announced the failure of a third large (1,690 patients), randomized, controlled trial (ISEL), that had been required as a condition of approval.[3] Based on this failure, on March 4, 2005, Public Citizen petitioned for FDA to withdraw Iressa from the market.[4] Under the accelerated approval process, this demonstrated lack of efficacy could have triggered the withdrawal of the drug.

As a consequence of these failures to prolong the lives of NSCLC patients, AstraZeneca withdrew its European Marketing Authorization Application   for Iressa on January 4, 2005.

On April 19, 2005, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced the failure of still another large clinical trial. Iressa treatment failed to improve either overall survival or progression-free survival in 672 NSCLC patients with Stage III cancer who had previously completed a combined chemotherapy and radiation regimen.[5] As a result, the trial was halted after an interim data analysis.

In how many trials does Iressa have to fail before it is withdrawn from the market and returned to an Investigational New Drug (IND) status? Under an IND, studies to attempt to determine the characteristics of patients who might benefit could continue. As long as Iressa has full approval status, patients risk being diverted from the currently approved drug, Tarceva, that does provide a survival benefit, as AstraZeneca itself acknowledged in its “Dear Doctor” letter.[6]

The effort by AstraZeneca to use post-hoc subanalyses to find subsets of patients that benefit from Iressa is not statistically valid.  As FDA’s Dr. Robert Temple commented: “The study, after all, failed. You had opportunities to identify subsets before the study that would be your primary analysis, but you didn't think that they were good enough to do that. . . . [T]hese are after-the-fact subset analyses in a study that did not win. That is different from subset analyses in a study that did win.”[7]

It is unconscionable to keep Iressa on the market, dosing patients for whom it offers no benefit while exposing them to the risk of serious adverse events. With 331 new Iressa prescriptions per week (as of mid-February), it is clear that a large of number of patients continue to be given a drug with no proven benefit but many risks.

With four negative mortality studies, the failure to remove Iressa from the market will mean that Subpart H has effectively become a back door to FDA approval, with a concomitant lowering of FDA approval standards. To restore its credibility, FDA  should promptly withdraw Iressa from the market.

Yours sincerely,

Elizabeth Barbehenn, Ph.D.
Research Analyst

Peter Lurie, M.D., M.P.H.
Deputy Director

Sidney Wolfe, M.D.
Director
Public Citizen’s Health Research Group

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.