Sign-up for Energy Action Alerts


Climate and Energy Blog


Challenging Corporate Mergers

Public Citizen opposes state and federal rubber-stamp approval of mergers that would result in utility combinations even larger than the infamous Power Trusts of the 1920s and 30s that collapsed. Modern mega-mergers have been faciliated by the 2005 repeal of the Public Utility Houlding Company Act (PUCHA).

Learn more about PUCHA and the impacts of its repeal.

Public Citizen Responds to Merger Trend

Consumers are threatened by the trend toward utility consolidation, as the larger companies will span multiple states, undermining the ability of local officials to protect consumers. Without meaningful consumer protections, these sprawling energy companies will have less transparent corporate structures, particulary as oil companies, investment banks and hedge funds move to acquire electric utilities.

Explore Select Cases:

Reply Testimony of Consumer Advocates to Maryland Public Service Commission on Constellation FP&L Merger (6/13/06) 
 
Consumer Advocates File Intervention and Protest of Constellation-FP&L Merger Before FERC (4/11/06)

Consumer Advocates File Intervention and Protest of Constellation-FP&L Merger Before Maryland Public Service Commission (4/11/06)

Public Citizen Files Lawsuit Challenging FERC's Approval of Exelon-PSEG Merger (2/15/06)

Public Citizen's Appeal of FERC's Order Authorizing the Duke-Cinergy Merger (1/26/06)

Public Citizen's Appeal of FERC's Order Authorizing the MidAmerican-Pacificorp Merger (1/9/06)

Comments on Proposed Merger of Exelon and PSEG (11/18/05)

Comments Opposing Merger of Duke Energy and Cinergy (11/18/05)

Comments Opposing Merger of MidAmerican Energy and Pacificorp (11/18/05)

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.